Skip to content

ナラティブ

争点あり

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

主張トラッカー

選挙

証拠ライブラリ

裁判所判決Constitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025新規
2025年3月13日付憲法事件第33/2024号に関する決定第1号
原本アーカイブ済み
監視団報告書OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)March 14, 2025
モルドバ、2024年大統領選挙および国民投票 — ODIHR最終報告書
原本アーカイブ済み
裁判所判決Constitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025新規
2025年3月13日付憲法事件第33/2024号に関する決定第1号
原本アーカイブ済み
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
共有XBlueskyFacebookLinkedInRedditWhatsAppTelegramEmail

共有リンクはネットワーク独自の作成画面を開きます。ここには埋め込みがないため、第三者があなたの閲覧ページを知ることはありません。