Skip to content

ナラティブ

否定済み

“The election results system was hacked, so the declared count is false”

An attack on a results-reporting system is repeatedly presented as an attack on the count. In every documented case here the two were separate systems. Ukraine’s Central Election Commission was genuinely compromised in 2014 and a fake results page was prepared — but ballots are paper, counted by hand at the precinct and carried physically for aggregation, and CERT-UA assessed the attack could in no way have determined the outcome. The Philippine "single IP address" claim was examined and rejected by both accredited citizens’ arms. Reports of Chinese nationals arrested for hacking Korean systems were called entirely false by the US military named in them. Public display layers are soft targets precisely because they are public; the legal count usually is not connected to them at all.

増幅主体

主張トラッカー

選挙

証拠ライブラリ

研究NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)2015
Revolution Hacking — Nikolay Koval, in Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine
原本アーカイブ済み
監視団報告書OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
ウクライナ、大統領早期選挙、2014年5月25日 — ODIHR最終報告書
原本アーカイブ済み
監視団報告書National Citizens' Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL)September 7, 2023新規
2022年全国・地方選挙の結果に関して提起された問題についてのNAMFREL公式声明
原本アーカイブ済み
監視団報告書OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
ウクライナ、大統領早期選挙、2014年5月25日 — ODIHR最終報告書
原本アーカイブ済み
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
共有XBlueskyFacebookLinkedInRedditWhatsAppTelegramEmail

共有リンクはネットワーク独自の作成画面を開きます。ここには埋め込みがないため、第三者があなたの閲覧ページを知ることはありません。