Skip to content

Narrativ

Avkreftet

“The election results system was hacked, so the declared count is false”

An attack on a results-reporting system is repeatedly presented as an attack on the count. In every documented case here the two were separate systems. Ukraine’s Central Election Commission was genuinely compromised in 2014 and a fake results page was prepared — but ballots are paper, counted by hand at the precinct and carried physically for aggregation, and CERT-UA assessed the attack could in no way have determined the outcome. The Philippine "single IP address" claim was examined and rejected by both accredited citizens’ arms. Reports of Chinese nationals arrested for hacking Korean systems were called entirely false by the US military named in them. Public display layers are soft targets precisely because they are public; the legal count usually is not connected to them at all.

Forsterkere

Påstandssporing

Valg

Bevisbibliotek

ForskningNATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)2015
Revolution Hacking — Nikolay Koval, i Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine
OriginalArkivert
ObservatørrapportOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
Ukraina, tidlig presidentvalg, 25. mai 2014 — ODIHR sluttrapport
OriginalArkivert
ObservatørrapportNational Citizens' Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL)September 7, 2023Ny
Offisiell uttalelse fra NAMFREL om spørsmålene som ble reist om resultatene av valget i 2022 for nasjonale og lokale verv
OriginalArkivert
ObservatørrapportOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
Ukraina, tidlig presidentvalg, 25. mai 2014 — ODIHR sluttrapport
OriginalArkivert
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

Delingslenker åpner nettverkets egen komponist. Ingenting er innebygd her, så ingen tredjepart får vite hvilke sider du leser.