Skip to content

Narrativ

Tillbakavisad

“The election results system was hacked, so the declared count is false”

An attack on a results-reporting system is repeatedly presented as an attack on the count. In every documented case here the two were separate systems. Ukraine’s Central Election Commission was genuinely compromised in 2014 and a fake results page was prepared — but ballots are paper, counted by hand at the precinct and carried physically for aggregation, and CERT-UA assessed the attack could in no way have determined the outcome. The Philippine "single IP address" claim was examined and rejected by both accredited citizens’ arms. Reports of Chinese nationals arrested for hacking Korean systems were called entirely false by the US military named in them. Public display layers are soft targets precisely because they are public; the legal count usually is not connected to them at all.

Förstärkare

Påståendespårare

Val

Bevisbibliotek

ForskningNATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)2015
Revolution Hacking — Nikolay Koval, i Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine
OriginalArkiverad
ObservatörsrapportOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
Ukraina, tidiga presidentvalet, 25 maj 2014 — ODIHR slutrapport
OriginalArkiverad
ObservatörsrapportNational Citizens' Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL)September 7, 2023Ny
Officiellt uttalande från NAMFREL om de frågor som väckts kring resultaten av de nationella och lokala valen 2022
OriginalArkiverad
ObservatörsrapportOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
Ukraina, tidiga presidentvalet, 25 maj 2014 — ODIHR slutrapport
OriginalArkiverad
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

Delningslänkar öppnar nätverkets egen kompositör. Inget bäddas in här, så ingen tredje part får veta vilka sidor du läser.