Skip to content

Narasi

Disengketakan

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

Pelacak Klaim

Pemilihan

Perpustakaan Bukti

Putusan pengadilanConstitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025Baru
Keputusan No. 1 tanggal 13 Maret 2025 tentang Perkara Konstitusional No. 33/2024
AsliDiarsipkan
Laporan pemantauOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)March 14, 2025
Moldova, pemilihan presiden dan referendum 2024 — laporan akhir ODIHR
AsliDiarsipkan
Putusan pengadilanConstitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025Baru
Keputusan No. 1 tanggal 13 Maret 2025 tentang Perkara Konstitusional No. 33/2024
AsliDiarsipkan
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

Tautan berbagi membuka penyusun milik jaringan itu sendiri. Tidak ada yang disematkan di sini, sehingga tidak ada pihak ketiga yang mengetahui halaman mana yang Anda baca.