Teiginys
Neteisingas
“The near-constant ratio between the two leading Philippine candidates in 2022 proves a preprogrammed result”
Peržiūrėta 2026 m. rugsėjo 22 d.
Išvada
False. A ratio between two candidates stabilises quickly once a large number of precincts have reported, which is an arithmetic property of averaging, not a signature of programming. Accredited observers rejected the inference.
Ką rodo įrodymai
ŽurnalistikaRappler2023 m. kovo 31 d.Naujas
2022 m. rinkimai: kur esame dėl VCM „nesutapimo“ ir perdavimo žurnalų?OriginalasArchyvuota
ŽurnalistikaRappler2023 m. rugsėjo 2 d.Naujas
Praėjus metams po 2022 m. rinkimų, PPCRV pakartoja nepagrįstus klastojimo kaltinimusOriginalasArchyvuota
Embed this card
Paste this into your page. The card stays live: if this record is later revised or re-rated, every embed updates with it — so you are never left publishing a verdict we have since changed.
<iframe src="https://voterights.org/embed/claim/philippines-2022-constant-ratio-preprogrammed" width="100%" height="260" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="VoteRights"></iframe>Free to embed under CC BY 4.0. The card is English-only for now, loads no tracking of any kind, and runs no script on your page.
Published 2026 m. rugsėjo 22 d.
2026 m. rugsėjo 22 d.Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
Dalijimosi nuorodos atidaro pačios tinklo kompozitorių. Čia niekas neįterpiama, todėl jokia trečioji šalis nesužino, kuriuos puslapius skaitėte.