Skip to content

Narasi

Dibantah

“An official-looking announcement declares a different winner”

The most direct attack on a result is to publish a false one that looks authoritative and hope it is repeated before it is checked. Attackers who compromised Ukraine’s Central Election Commission in 2014 prepared a fabricated results page naming a different winner; it never reached the official display, but the figure was broadcast anyway on Russian state television. The count itself was unaffected — Ukrainian ballots are paper, counted by hand and delivered physically — and the published official result matched the count. The forgery’s value to its authors lay entirely in being quoted.

Penguat

Pelacak Klaim

Pemilihan

Perpustakaan Bukti

PenelitianNATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)2015
Revolution Hacking — Nikolay Koval, dalam Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine
AsliDiarsipkan
Laporan pemantauOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)30 Juni 2014
Ukraina, Pemilihan Presiden Dini, 25 Mei 2014 — laporan akhir ODIHR
AsliDiarsipkan
Published 22 September 2026
22 September 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

Tautan berbagi membuka penyusun milik jaringan itu sendiri. Tidak ada yang disematkan di sini, sehingga tidak ada pihak ketiga yang mengetahui halaman mana yang Anda baca.