Skip to content

서사

다툼 중

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

주장 추적기

선거

증거 라이브러리

법원 판결Constitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025새로움
헌법 사건 No. 33/2024에 관한 2025년 3월 13일자 결정 No. 1
원본보관본
관찰자 보고서OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)March 14, 2025
몰도바, 2024년 대통령 선거 및 국민투표 — ODIHR 최종 보고서
원본보관본
법원 판결Constitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025새로움
헌법 사건 No. 33/2024에 관한 2025년 3월 13일자 결정 No. 1
원본보관본
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

공유 링크는 네트워크 자체의 작성기를 엽니다. 여기에는 어떤 것도 삽입되지 않으므로, 제3자는 귀하가 읽은 페이지를 알 수 없습니다.