Teiginys
Neteisingas
“The irregularities that annulled Austria’s 2016 run-off changed who won”
Peržiūrėta 2026 m. rugsėjo 22 d.
Išvada
False. The annulment followed from the possibility that the procedural violations could have influenced the result, not from any finding that they did. The re-run produced the same winner, by a wider margin.
Ką rodo įrodymai
Teismo sprendimasConstitutional Court of Austria (Verfassungsgerichtshof)2016 m. liepos 1 d.
Konstitucinio Teismo sprendimas W I 6/2016-125 (antrojo turo panaikinimas)OriginalasArchyvuota
Embed this card
Paste this into your page. The card stays live: if this record is later revised or re-rated, every embed updates with it — so you are never left publishing a verdict we have since changed.
<iframe src="https://voterights.org/embed/claim/austria-2016-irregularities-changed-winner" width="100%" height="260" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="VoteRights"></iframe>Free to embed under CC BY 4.0. The card is English-only for now, loads no tracking of any kind, and runs no script on your page.
Published 2026 m. rugsėjo 22 d.
2026 m. rugsėjo 22 d.Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
Dalijimosi nuorodos atidaro pačios tinklo kompozitorių. Čia niekas neįterpiama, todėl jokia trečioji šalis nesužino, kuriuos puslapius skaitėte.