Apgalvojums
Nepatiess
“The near-constant ratio between the two leading Philippine candidates in 2022 proves a preprogrammed result”
Pārskatīts September 22, 2026
Secinājums
False. A ratio between two candidates stabilises quickly once a large number of precincts have reported, which is an arithmetic property of averaging, not a signature of programming. Accredited observers rejected the inference.
Ko rāda pierādījumi
ŽurnālistikaRapplerMarch 31, 2023Jauns
2022. gada vēlēšanas: kur mēs esam attiecībā uz VCM “discrepancy” un pārraides žurnāliem?OriģinālsArhivēts
ŽurnālistikaRapplerSeptember 2, 2023Jauns
Gadu pēc 2022. gada vēlēšanām PPCRV atkārto nepamatotus apgalvojumus par vēlēšanu viltošanuOriģinālsArhivēts
Embed this card
Paste this into your page. The card stays live: if this record is later revised or re-rated, every embed updates with it — so you are never left publishing a verdict we have since changed.
<iframe src="https://voterights.org/embed/claim/philippines-2022-constant-ratio-preprogrammed" width="100%" height="260" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="VoteRights"></iframe>Free to embed under CC BY 4.0. The card is English-only for now, loads no tracking of any kind, and runs no script on your page.
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
Kopīgošanas saites atver tīkla paša rakstītāju. Šeit nekas netiek iegults, tāpēc trešā puse neuzzina, kuras lapas jūs lasāt.