Skip to content

Narratief

Betwist

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

Claims-tracker

Verkiezingen

Bewijslibrary

Rechterlijke uitspraakConstitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria13 maart 2025Nieuw
Besluit nr. 1 van 13 maart 2025 inzake constitutionele zaak nr. 33/2024
OrigineelGearchiveerd
ObservatierapportOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)14 maart 2025
Moldavië, presidentsverkiezingen en referendum 2024 — ODIHR-eindrapport
OrigineelGearchiveerd
Rechterlijke uitspraakConstitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria13 maart 2025Nieuw
Besluit nr. 1 van 13 maart 2025 inzake constitutionele zaak nr. 33/2024
OrigineelGearchiveerd
Published 22 september 2026
22 september 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

Deel links openen de eigen composer van het netwerk. Hier is niets ingebed, zodat geen derde partij te weten komt welke pagina's u leest.