Skip to content

Narațiune

Contestat

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

Urmărirea afirmațiilor

Alegeri

Biblioteca de dovezi

Hotărâre judecătoreascăConstitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria13 martie 2025Nou
Decizia nr. 1 din 13 martie 2025 privind cauza constituțională nr. 33/2024
OriginalArhivat
Raport al observatoruluiOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)14 martie 2025
Moldova, alegerile prezidențiale și referendumul din 2024 — raportul final ODIHR
OriginalArhivat
Hotărâre judecătoreascăConstitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria13 martie 2025Nou
Decizia nr. 1 din 13 martie 2025 privind cauza constituțională nr. 33/2024
OriginalArhivat
Published 22 septembrie 2026
22 septembrie 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
DistribuițiXBlueskyFacebookLinkedInRedditWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Linkurile de distribuire deschid propriul editor al rețelei. Nimic nu este încorporat aici, astfel încât nicio terță parte nu află ce pagini citiți.