Skip to content

Naratív

Sporné

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

Sledovanie tvrdení

Voľby

Knižnica dôkazov

Súdne rozhodnutieConstitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025New
Rozhodnutie č. 1 z 13. marca 2025 vo veci ústavnej veci č. 33/2024
PôvodnéArchivované
Správa pozorovateľaOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)March 14, 2025
Moldavsko, prezidentské voľby a referendum 2024 — záverečná správa ODIHR
PôvodnéArchivované
Súdne rozhodnutieConstitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025New
Rozhodnutie č. 1 z 13. marca 2025 vo veci ústavnej veci č. 33/2024
PôvodnéArchivované
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
ZdieľaťXBlueskyFacebookLinkedInRedditWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Odkazy na zdieľanie otvárajú vlastný editor siete. Nič tu nie je vložené, takže žiadna tretia strana sa nedozvie, ktoré stránky čítate.