Skip to content

Tường thuật

Đã bác bỏ

“The election results system was hacked, so the declared count is false”

An attack on a results-reporting system is repeatedly presented as an attack on the count. In every documented case here the two were separate systems. Ukraine’s Central Election Commission was genuinely compromised in 2014 and a fake results page was prepared — but ballots are paper, counted by hand at the precinct and carried physically for aggregation, and CERT-UA assessed the attack could in no way have determined the outcome. The Philippine "single IP address" claim was examined and rejected by both accredited citizens’ arms. Reports of Chinese nationals arrested for hacking Korean systems were called entirely false by the US military named in them. Public display layers are soft targets precisely because they are public; the legal count usually is not connected to them at all.

Bên khuếch đại

Theo dõi tuyên bố

Bầu cử

Thư viện bằng chứng

Nghiên cứuNATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)2015
Revolution Hacking — Nikolay Koval, trong Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine
Bản gốcĐã lưu trữ
Báo cáo quan sát viênOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
Ukraine, Bầu cử tổng thống sớm, 25 tháng 5 năm 2014 — báo cáo cuối cùng của ODIHR
Bản gốcĐã lưu trữ
Báo cáo quan sát viênOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)June 30, 2014
Ukraine, Bầu cử tổng thống sớm, 25 tháng 5 năm 2014 — báo cáo cuối cùng của ODIHR
Bản gốcĐã lưu trữ
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
Chia sẻXBlueskyFacebookLinkedInRedditWhatsAppTelegramEmail

Các liên kết chia sẻ sẽ mở trình soạn thảo riêng của mạng lưới. Không có nội dung nhúng nào ở đây, nên không bên thứ ba nào biết bạn đã đọc những trang nào.