Skip to content

서사

반박됨

“The election results system was hacked, so the declared count is false”

An attack on a results-reporting system is repeatedly presented as an attack on the count. In every documented case here the two were separate systems. Ukraine’s Central Election Commission was genuinely compromised in 2014 and a fake results page was prepared — but ballots are paper, counted by hand at the precinct and carried physically for aggregation, and CERT-UA assessed the attack could in no way have determined the outcome. The Philippine "single IP address" claim was examined and rejected by both accredited citizens’ arms. Reports of Chinese nationals arrested for hacking Korean systems were called entirely false by the US military named in them. Public display layers are soft targets precisely because they are public; the legal count usually is not connected to them at all.

증폭 주체

주장 추적기

선거

증거 라이브러리

연구NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE)2015년
Revolution Hacking — Nikolay Koval, in Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine
원본보관본
관찰자 보고서OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)2014년 6월 30일
우크라이나, 조기 대통령 선거, 2014년 5월 25일 — ODIHR 최종 보고서
원본보관본
관찰자 보고서National Citizens' Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL)2023년 9월 7일새로움
2022년 전국 및 지방선거 결과와 관련해 제기된 쟁점에 대한 NAMFREL의 공식 성명
원본보관본
관찰자 보고서OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)2014년 6월 30일
우크라이나, 조기 대통령 선거, 2014년 5월 25일 — ODIHR 최종 보고서
원본보관본
Published 2026년 9월 22일
2026년 9월 22일Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

공유 링크는 네트워크 자체의 작성기를 엽니다. 여기에는 어떤 것도 삽입되지 않으므로, 제3자는 귀하가 읽은 페이지를 알 수 없습니다.