Apgalvojums
Nepatiess
“The irregularities that annulled Austria’s 2016 run-off changed who won”
Pārskatīts 2026. gada 22. septembris
Secinājums
False. The annulment followed from the possibility that the procedural violations could have influenced the result, not from any finding that they did. The re-run produced the same winner, by a wider margin.
Ko rāda pierādījumi
Tiesas nolēmumsConstitutional Court of Austria (Verfassungsgerichtshof)2016. gada 1. jūlijs
Konstitucionālās tiesas lēmums W I 6/2016-125 (otrajā kārtā anulēšana)OriģinālsArhivēts
Embed this card
Paste this into your page. The card stays live: if this record is later revised or re-rated, every embed updates with it — so you are never left publishing a verdict we have since changed.
<iframe src="https://voterights.org/embed/claim/austria-2016-irregularities-changed-winner" width="100%" height="260" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="VoteRights"></iframe>Free to embed under CC BY 4.0. The card is English-only for now, loads no tracking of any kind, and runs no script on your page.
Published 2026. gada 22. septembris
2026. gada 22. septembrisPublished1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.
Kopīgošanas saites atver tīkla paša rakstītāju. Šeit nekas netiek iegults, tāpēc trešā puse neuzzina, kuras lapas jūs lasāt.