Skip to content

叙事

有争议

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

主张追踪

选举

证据库

法院裁决Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria2025年3月13日
关于宪法案件第33/2024号的2025年3月13日第1号决定
原始已存档
观察员报告OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)2025年3月14日
摩尔多瓦,2024年总统选举和公投——ODIHR最终报告
原始已存档
法院裁决Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria2025年3月13日
关于宪法案件第33/2024号的2025年3月13日第1号决定
原始已存档
Published 2026年9月22日
2026年9月22日Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

分享链接会打开该网络自身的撰写器。此处不嵌入任何内容,因此不会有第三方得知您阅读了哪些页面。