Skip to content

Narrazione

Conteso

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

Registro delle affermazioni

Elezioni

Biblioteca delle prove

SentenzaConstitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025Nuovo
Decisione n. 1 del 13 marzo 2025 sul caso costituzionale n. 33/2024
OriginaleArchiviato
Rapporto degli osservatoriOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)March 14, 2025
Moldova, elezione presidenziale e referendum 2024 — rapporto finale ODIHR
OriginaleArchiviato
SentenzaConstitutional Court of the Republic of BulgariaMarch 13, 2025Nuovo
Decisione n. 1 del 13 marzo 2025 sul caso costituzionale n. 33/2024
OriginaleArchiviato
Published September 22, 2026
September 22, 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

I link di condivisione aprono il compositore nativo della rete. Qui non è incorporato nulla, quindi nessuna terza parte viene a sapere quali pagine hai letto.