Skip to content

Narrativa

Contestado

“The votes cast abroad were manufactured to change the result”

Out-of-country ballots report late, skew differently from the domestic electorate and are the hardest segment for observers to cover — three properties that make them a standing target for suspicion in any close race. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Court examined claims that voters were unlawfully added to out-of-country lists and that multiple voting was widespread, and rejected the requests to void the October 2024 election. In Moldova the diaspora vote was decisive and heavily contested, and ODIHR assessed the administration as professional and impartial. Kept at contested rather than debunked because the segment genuinely is harder to observe, and a claim that is unproven in the cases examined here is not thereby disproved everywhere.

Rastreador de alegações

Eleições

Biblioteca de evidências

Decisão judicialConstitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria13 de março de 2025Novo
Decisão n.º 1 de 13 de março de 2025 no Processo Constitucional n.º 33/2024
OriginalArquivado
Relatório de observadorOSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)14 de março de 2025
Moldova, eleição presidencial e referendo de 2024 — relatório final da ODIHR
OriginalArquivado
Decisão judicialConstitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria13 de março de 2025Novo
Decisão n.º 1 de 13 de março de 2025 no Processo Constitucional n.º 33/2024
OriginalArquivado
Published 22 de setembro de 2026
22 de setembro de 2026Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

As ligações de partilha abrem o compositor próprio da rede. Nada é incorporado aqui, pelo que nenhum terceiro sabe que páginas leu.