Skip to content

主张

错误

“The near-constant ratio between the two leading Philippine candidates in 2022 proves a preprogrammed result”

已审查 2026年9月22日

结论

False. A ratio between two candidates stabilises quickly once a large number of precincts have reported, which is an arithmetic property of averaging, not a signature of programming. Accredited observers rejected the inference.

菲律宾适用于: 菲律宾 2022年总统选举

证据显示什么

Embed this card

Paste this into your page. The card stays live: if this record is later revised or re-rated, every embed updates with it — so you are never left publishing a verdict we have since changed.

<iframe src="https://voterights.org/embed/claim/philippines-2022-constant-ratio-preprogrammed" width="100%" height="260" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="VoteRights"></iframe>

Free to embed under CC BY 4.0. The card is English-only for now, loads no tracking of any kind, and runs no script on your page.

Published 2026年9月22日
2026年9月22日Published1579e19e
Every change to this record is a commit in the project’s version history. The reference beside each date identifies it.

分享链接会打开该网络自身的撰写器。此处不嵌入任何内容,因此不会有第三方得知您阅读了哪些页面。