Skip to content

The Academy

Understand an election well enough to check one yourself.

Plain-language explainers on how votes are counted, how elections are attacked, and how to test a claim before you believe it — each one tied to the documented cases in this database.

Start with the core distinctionBrowse the curriculumFree. No account. Nothing to sign up for.
14
Explainers
7
Tracks
121
Minutes of reading
40
Languages

The first skill

“Election fraud” is five different things in one word

Separating them is what this Academy teaches first, and it is why the database can say an election was attacked and its count was sound in the same breath. Each category needs its own evidence, and confusing them is how a real finding gets dismissed — or an unproven one gets believed.

Learn the five categories

Start here

The flagship explainers

One per track, each written to stand on its own. Read these and the rest of the curriculum follows easily.

Curriculum

The tracks, in the order they build

Read straight through, or drop into the track that answers the question you actually arrived with.

Electoral systems

How votes become seats and winners. The rules that turn ballots into outcomes — first-past-the-post, proportional representation, ranked choice — and what each one does to the result.

1 article9 min

Browse the track

How this is written

Explainers you are meant to check

Tied to documented cases

Claims link to the election, operation, or archived source they came from — not to another explainer.

One standard, every country

The same five categories and five evidence tiers apply everywhere, including to Western democracies.

Self-tests, never scores

Some articles end with a few questions. Nothing is timed, scored, or stored — the explanation under each answer is the point.

Free and translated

No account, no paywall, no email. Every article is published in every language the site serves.

Now use it on a real case

The Academy explains the method. The database is where it is applied — every documented finding tiered by how strong the evidence behind it actually is.