Election Integrity Database
The truth about elections, held to a single standard.
Elections documented, attacked, and defended — with proven falsification kept strictly apart from interference, propaganda, and mere anomaly. Every finding is tiered by the strength of its evidence.
- 62
- elections
- 20
- operations
- 395
- sources
Database last updated September 6, 2026
Research tools
Interrogate the evidence, not just the headlines
Ask precise questions, compare cases, trace documented relationships, inspect change over time, and reuse the underlying data.
Evidence Lab
Build a transparent question and inspect every matching case.
Investigations
Short, curated paths through cases and primary evidence.
Compare
Compare the evidence fingerprints of three elections.
Network
Walk from a case to its findings, sources and related records.
Country Twins
Find countries with comparable voting rules and safeguards.
Time Machine
See when records entered the public database and changed.
Timeline
Documented cases in chronological order.
Statistics
The corpus counted, compared and charted.
Open Data
Bulk exports and a read-only API, CC BY 4.0.
The database at a glance
Documented findings by category
Documented cases over time
2019–2027 · 68 of 82
Five categories, never conflated
The difference between these is the whole point. An attacked election is not the same as a falsified one.
The recorded numbers do not reflect the votes cast.
Process violationsUnequal media access, repression, illegal financing, vote buying, misuse of state resources.
Foreign interferenceCyberattacks, hack-and-leak, covert foreign financing, impersonation of media or institutions by a foreign state or proxy.
Information operationsTroll farms, fake local-media networks, covert political ads, coordinated inauthentic amplification — foreign or domestic.
Statistical anomaliesPatterns in the data worth examining — explicitly not proof of fraud.
A finding sits in exactly one category. Colors and icons carry the same meaning everywhere on the site.
From the case files
What was proven — and what was not
The clearest test of a trustworthy record is whether it can hold both statements at once.
South Korea 2025 Presidential Election
What is established
- Process violationsConfirmed
Military personnel were sent to National Election Commission premises during the December 2024 martial law declaration and photographed the commission's computer systems without a warrant.
More detail
About 297 personnel were deployed within ten minutes of the declaration on the night of 3 December 2024: roughly 10 to the NEC headquarters in Gwacheon, 130 to the NEC training centre in Suwon and 47 to the National Election Survey Deliberation Commission in Seoul. The Constitutional Court found that the deployed troops controlled access, seized staff mobile phones and photographed the IT systems, and that these searches and seizures without a warrant violated the warrant requirement and infringed the independence of the commission as a constitutional body.
- Information operationsConfirmed
The sitting president publicly grounded the martial law decree in election-fraud suspicions about the election commission's computer systems.
More detail
In a televised address on 12 December 2024 Yoon Suk Yeol said that 'the NEC's capability of managing elections is questionable' and that he 'was wondering if voters would trust the election results when its cybersecurity is so vulnerable to cyberattacks and hacking', citing the National Intelligence Service's 2023 checkup as his basis for sending troops to commission premises. The Constitutional Court recorded his contention that martial law was declared to dispel suspicions of electoral fraud and held that simply having such suspicions did not mean that a serious crisis had actually occurred, noting that the commission had already taken security measures before the election.
What is not established
- Result falsificationDebunked
The claim that early voting and ballot counting were computer-manipulated was tested in the Supreme Court over the 2020 National Assembly election and rejected.
More detail
The Supreme Court, the only court competent to hear a challenge to a presidential or National Assembly election, gave judgment on 28 July 2022 in cases 2020Su30 and 2020Su5028, the lead suits seeking annulment of results of the 15 April 2020 National Assembly election, and dismissed the plaintiffs' claims; the press release records the cases as those in which recount allegations were examined. Fact-checking of the whole set of suits found that all 126 were dismissed and that the irregularly printed 'cabbage leaf' ballots offered as evidence were held by the court to be minor mistakes and simple mechanical errors that could not be evidence of fraud changing an outcome.
- Foreign interferenceDebunked
Reports that Chinese nationals were caught hacking Korean election systems were called entirely false by the United States military named in them.
More detail
Claims circulating after the martial law declaration held that United States and Korean forces had arrested Chinese hackers at a National Election Commission training facility. United States Forces Korea issued a statement saying that the descriptions of and claims about the United States military in those reports were 'entirely false'. The record of the training centre for that night accounts for the people staying there as 96 in total, 88 public officials on promotion and posting courses and eight external auditors.
Sources:1
Method
Why you can trust this
No source, no claim. The same taxonomy and evidence bar applies to every country, party, and government — including Western democracies.
Read the methodologyAcademy
Learn how elections actually work
How votes are counted and verified, why interference is not the same as fraud, and how to check a viral claim yourself.
Enter the AcademyUpdates
Recently added and revised
- SourceConstitutional Court of Romania, Decision No. 32/2024 (annulment)
- SourceMozambique Elections 315: Two top aides of Venâncio Mondlane gunned down
- SourcePress release on the challenges faced by the Election Commission during the electoral process
- SourceNational Assembly Turnout — General Elections, 2024
- SourceGE-2024: Ballots Rejected = 1,768,471