Election Integrity & Foreign Influence Database
The truth about elections, held to a single standard.
Elections documented, attacked, and defended — with proven falsification kept strictly apart from interference, propaganda, and mere anomaly. Every finding is tiered by the strength of its evidence.
- 45
- elections
- 20
- operations
- 210
- sources
Database last updated August 5, 2026
The database at a glance
Documented findings by category
Documented cases over time
2019–2027 · 52 of 65
Five categories, never conflated
The difference between these is the whole point. An attacked election is not the same as a falsified one.
The recorded numbers do not reflect the votes cast.
Process violationsUnequal media access, repression, illegal financing, vote buying, misuse of state resources.
Foreign interferenceCyberattacks, hack-and-leak, covert foreign financing, impersonation of media or institutions by a foreign state or proxy.
Information operationsTroll farms, fake local-media networks, covert political ads, coordinated inauthentic amplification — foreign or domestic.
Statistical anomaliesPatterns in the data worth examining — explicitly not proof of fraud.
A finding sits in exactly one category. Colors and icons carry the same meaning everywhere on the site.
From the case files
What was proven — and what was not
The clearest test of a trustworthy record is whether it can hold both statements at once.
Romania 2025 Repeat Presidential Election
What is established
- Information operationsConfirmed
ODIHR documented widespread use of inauthentic online behaviour by candidates and a fragmented regulatory response during the repeat campaign. It also recorded disinformation narratives that state authorities assessed as originating outside Romania; ODIHR reported that assessment rather than making its own attribution.
Sources:1 - Process violationsConfirmed
ODIHR found that candidate-eligibility requirements based on court rulings rather than clear legal provisions detracted from the inclusivity of candidate registration.
Sources:1
What is not established
- Foreign interferenceContested
George Simion's challenge alleging foreign interference and disinformation sufficient to annul the runoff was unanimously dismissed as unfounded by the Constitutional Court, which validated the result. The dismissal establishes that the annulment challenge failed, not that no interference occurred — a distinction the sibling 2024 record also preserves.
- Result falsificationDebunked
The Central Electoral Bureau published polling-station-level results and the Constitutional Court validated the winner. The cited record does not establish altered ballots or vote totals.
Method
Why you can trust this
No source, no claim. The same taxonomy and evidence bar applies to every country, party, and government — including Western democracies.
Read the methodologyAcademy
Learn how elections actually work
How votes are counted and verified, why interference is not the same as fraud, and how to check a viral claim yourself.
Enter the AcademyUpdates
Recently added and revised
- SourceIllegal Doppelganger operation: targeting the Polish elections
- SourceConstitutional Court of Romania, Decision No. 32/2024 (annulment)
- SourceJustice Department disrupts covert Russian government-sponsored foreign malign influence operation
- SourceSix Russian GRU Officers Charged in Connection with Worldwide Deployment of Destructive Malware and Other Disruptive Actions in Cyberspace
- SourceEuropean Union Election Observation Mission Ecuador 2025 final report